Mac news from outside the reality distortion field
Type Size  -  +
November 4, 2007, 9:56 am

Apple Set to Disable iPhone Apps — Again

picture-27.jpgHere we go again.

British reviewers who have tested the Apple (AAPL) iPhone that goes on sale in the U.K. Friday report that it comes pre-installed with a software update — 1.1.2 — that disables third-party applications.

According to the British gadget website T3, the update closes the so-called TIFF exploit — the software loophole used by hackers to “jailbreak” version 1.1.1. This loophole allowed iPhone owners to install dozens of third-party apps, including such popular add-ons as Navizon (a location finder), Voice Notes (a voice recorder) and instant-messaging programs like Apollo and Mobile Chat.

Thanks to one-click installations scripts like AppSnapp, these unauthorized iPhone add-ons have become almost mainstream. AppSnapp’s developers report that their software was downloaded 144,000 times in its first three days — which suggests that as many as 1 in 10 iPhone owners could be in for a rude surprise when they upgrade their software next weekend.

Some Apple bloggers — led by Quincy Pince-Nez at 9to5 Mac — advocate holding-off any iTunes and iPhone updates until programmers can find another way to install their apps. Apple would undoubtedly prefer that everybody wait until it releases its official iPhone software developers kit (SDK) in February, and Apple-sanctioned apps start to flow in.

The update is also likely to disable — and perhaps re-brick — iPhones unlocked to work with cellular providers other than Apple’s official carriers (AT&T in the U.S., O2 in the U.K., T-Mobile in Germany and Orange in France).

[Photo courtesy of T3]

Who said buying anything by Apple is the cheapest - Apple is a premium product. Like a Mercedes. And they don’t want any applications that they don’t provide mucking up their phones. You don’t buy a Mac because it is cheap. You buy it because you can afford the best. The Mac has never marketed itself as the cheapest - only the easiest to use and the best. So if you can afford an i-phone you can afford a few extra dollars to buy a ring tone.

Posted By Vicki Marietta Georgia : November 13, 2007 9:39 am

Then fine, Tony. Modify your iPhone to your heart’s delight. Why not remove ALL of Apple’s software and create your own. It’s your iPhone, so have at it. But I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you STILL want to be able to use Apple software/UI, right?

Why not expend all of your efforts and load your iPhone with Windows Mobile Media? It should be a thing of beauty. You sound like a PC kind of guy. You and Steve Ballmer deserve one another.

Posted By Big D, Mtn. View, CA : November 10, 2007 9:58 pm

Windows users keep crowing about Marketshare as if it is the greatest thing of all.

1)Ford Excels have greater markert share than Lamborghinis. I’ll rather have a lamborghini.

2) The only reason Windows has greater market share is that it ran on cheap clones. But because of this Windows has all kinds of horrible compatibility issues. Today windows price advantage is shrinking because apple with intel is competitive on pricing.

3) Because Apple has smaller market share it can grow faster now. Apple can Double, can Windows?

Apple one year return 138%.
Microsoft 39%

As an investor you would have made a lot more money on Apple.

Posted By dave. Victoria. BC. : November 5, 2007 3:51 pm

Microsoft market share 344 Billion. OS Market share 90%.
Apple market share 163 Billion. OS Market share 8%. Who is the genius now?

Posted By Stephen, Austin, Texas : November 5, 2007 2:39 pm

Apple is opening themselves to another suit in the UK. I’m not sure what the UK laws are, but in the US it is illegal for a manufacturer to disable a product that no longer belongs to them to block different 3rd parties. It would be like HP and Microsoft deciding to disable my computer if I decide to partiton my hard drive and put Linux on it. My warrantee would be void, but I would sue if my $1000 computer was rendered inoperable for doing it.

Europe tends to be more finicky about antitrust laws than the US. They’re going to get burned over this within the next year. Sooner or later, they’ll learn from this. Apple is too good of a company to allow things like this to tarnish their image.

Right now, they’re in a perfect position to put their MAC OSx on the open market. If they do, they would probably take 10-20% market share away from MS win a year. Microsoft will always have the edge in the commercial market, but Apple could easily own the consumer and multimedia market.

If Apple wants to keep bugs out of their products, the most ethical thing to do is to make and enforce high standards from software and hardware vendors. When you exploit your smart consumers for the “greater good,” you only lose your smart consumers.

Posted By Mike, San Antonio, TX : November 5, 2007 2:26 pm

Way back when, Apple closed its OS, Microsoft opened its OS and the result was a 90% market share for Windows and a paltry 8% market share for Apple. So what did Jobs learn from this experience? Apparently, absolutely nothing. Instead of opening up and allowing 3rd party development to flourish, thereby making IPhone the defacto standard, Jobs repeats his past mistakes and and closes down again. Why is it that a regular guy like me sees this and a genius like Jobs does not?

Posted By Andrew Levin Hudson, NH : November 5, 2007 12:16 pm

so much apple defense. what a pity.

i see more childish, if not drone quality retorts from the people defending apple and at&t then the people crticizing.

let’s start with the tiff exploit: updating and fixing this exploit would have absolutely no impact on third party applications (who the hell uses tiff anymore, aside screenprinters? i’m a graphic designer, i see maybe half a dozen tiff images a year, and they come from clients with equipment that’s about 10 years outdated) so, really, let’s stop blinding ourselves so willingly as to why and what.

the update, whether the tiff is a subversion, a ruse, or just an also-ran meant to validate this ‘update’ (microsoft’s done similar stunts on patch tuesdays) also.. is shifty. no one does a point release for one single fix. no one. this update better be loaded for there to be a point release justification.

someone already covered it. follow the money. at&t has contracts with apple that include plans for profiting off 3rd party applications, not letting people develop and install them of their own accord. (comparative common application: mozilla firefox, with its freely developed and dispersed extensions.)

expect to pay money for your 3rd party applications, becuase really folks.. steve jobs is just out to job you ;)

Posted By tv, st. louis, mo : November 5, 2007 11:42 am

When you break the “seal” on any product it voids the warranty. When you sign an agreement and break it. That says a lot about you as a person, namely that you have poor character and bad judgement. Hackers hack because they have ego and self-esteem issues. Also because they have no life. Get a life for crying out loud.

Posted By P.Blake Las Vegas, NV. : November 5, 2007 10:43 am

This is pretty pathetic. Nobody is forcing you to upgrade to newer firmware. If you want to keep your third party apps, don’t upgrade to 1.1.2 when it becomes available. Why in the world would Apple expend engineering resources trying to test whether random third party hacks are going to be affected by a software upgrade?

Posted By Barry L, San Ramon, CA : November 5, 2007 3:40 am

The WORST thing about the iPhone, is that you CAN NOT put it under a business account. Even though the retail guy told me I could. So if you already have a “personal” cell, and you wanted one for business….nope. Just got off the phone with AT&T about that.

Posted By John, SF, CA : November 5, 2007 2:40 am

Tony, Apple is not telling you that you can’t do anything you want to. That is your right. However it is alsoTHEIR RIGHT to define their conditions for providing continued service and support. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. You have a severe case of cerebral rectal inversion and need help badly.Get it and grow up into real world.

Posted By Gary H, Mamaroneck NY : November 4, 2007 6:45 pm

I started using Apple products because I WANTED the additional security and lack of exposure to viruses. If you are getting on board with Apple, then you are going to have to change your perception of what to expect from a BETTER product. Get over yourselves and enjoy!

Posted By Ben Johnson, Springfield, MO : November 4, 2007 6:14 pm

When you purchase an iPhone, you agreed to things you may not do … ever. You don’t want to follow the rules, fine, go by a Motorola phone and shut up. Jobs does not want nor care for your business. Get lost, he says.

Posted By Norm from Norman Oklahoma : November 4, 2007 5:19 pm

Honestly the comments I’ve read here ares some of the most idiotic in a long time. The idea that closing a TIFF exploit is Apple being a control freaky is so utterly ridiculous. This is a VECTOR for malware!!! Apple would be completely negligent (actually has been) to leave this open.

It’s your phone and you don’t have to update it and you can crack its security to your heart’s content. But users are certainly served by having security exploits closed and a real SDK. (And, feel free not to buy one–doh!)

But words like “disreputable” for closing down security exploits. That’s just beyond the pale stupidity… sorry to revert to name calling, but puh-lease! It is against my better judgement that I even bother…

@JamesK… look up on CNET for the faster laptop they’ve tested running Windows Vista!

Posted By yet another steve, San Diego, CA : November 4, 2007 4:29 pm

Steve Jobs, You are a genious!!! Tell people they can’t do something and young guys will step up to the plate to say “Says who?” This has been some of the greatest free publicity I’ve ever seen someone get for their product. You are a genious. Bill Gates, same to you. You have got a whole fleet of hackers out there on the Internet giving you some of the greatest vulnerability testing for free. Thats right for free!!! We all know that at the end of the day we will still use their products with or without vulnerabilities. I gotta hand it to you. For every guy out there trying to break your products for free you get to pocket those dollars saved on another employee. Heeehhh…. I Love It. Great for the stock shareholder!!!

Posted By Stephen, Austin, Texas : November 4, 2007 3:59 pm

These third party app developers know that their software will become useless or full of bugs when any iphone update is done, this is not Apple’s fault. The proper way to develop is to wait for the developer kit. Developers will then receive a pre release of the update to assure their application will run smoothly. This is the OS X works on the Mac.

Posted By John R, Bethel, CT. : November 4, 2007 3:27 pm

Here we go again. The reason that Apple is against the ulocking and hacking of the iPhone is because of their huge contracts with the service providers. If apple were to simply allow their product to be used on other networks, AT&T would sue them for allowing it to happen because they paid for “exclusive” rights. This isn’t that difficult when you follow the money trail. Get over it hackers.

Posted By Chris Punque, Steubenville, OH : November 4, 2007 1:32 pm

I do not know what you people are arguing over, nor do I care, I sense that you have some holes in your life that you are patching with a phone, I suggest a gallon of paint and a disrepaired fence will work wonders.

Posted By Gene, colbert Washington : November 4, 2007 1:15 pm

You people are missing the point. This is bona fide HACKING. These hackers are using a TIFF exploit that, if left unfixed by Apple, could eventually be used to make an iPhone virus. So it’s not the massive SJ conspiracy that everyone makes it out to be.

Posted By Cameron, Winston-Salem, NC : November 4, 2007 12:54 pm

Posted By Tony
>When I purchase a phone it becomes my property to do >with as I please. Apple has no right to prevent me >modifying my property. I would never buy an iPhone >from such a disreputable company.

I agree perhaps Apple can make you sign an agreement of forfait of customer service so when your iphone has so many buggy apps installed that it doesn’t work they won’t be blamed.. yeah that should work LOL

Posted By JT NYC : November 4, 2007 12:30 pm

as much as these kind of decisions might look bad or anti-consumer
the fact is the Mac os has become so stable and secure because Jobs always kept control of the hardware and software with the iPhone is no different if Apple where to open this to all to develop crappy apps then we will soon have the issues plaguing the windows world and mac users don’t want that to happen, although it opens apple up to criticism from new users or anti apple zealots it is good to keep control on what gets installed on your hardware , then of course if you have a more “it’s mine and I do what I want” attitude you can pass on the iphone and get something else .. noone is forcing consumers to buy the iphone or any other Apple product

Posted By luke NY : November 4, 2007 12:27 pm

For the record, I posted a comment about how CNN/Money only posts negative Apple stories. Of course the comment was immediately removed.

Gimme a break.

Posted By John Romano, Los Angeles, CA : November 4, 2007 12:24 pm

You may own the phone, but Apple owns the software on it - they have only given you a license to use it. I think it’s dumb, but they have the right to modify the software any way they choose.

Posted By Edgar M, Seattle, Washington : November 4, 2007 12:17 pm

I don’t understand…all parties acknowledge that the TIFF exploit is possible because of a bug. Fixing bugs is a good thing. I might like 3rd party apps, but I can wait until they’re properly deployed. When did we start criticizing vendors for fixing their bugs?

Posted By Orac, Seattle, WA : November 4, 2007 12:12 pm

Tony, it always depends upon the licensing conditions that you agree to when you purchase property.

Posted By Jim, St. Louis, MO : November 4, 2007 12:11 pm

why do people like you, tony, even bother to leave comments? you can deface your phone, or void your warranty, as you like. and when you ruin your phone, don’t forget to laugh.

Posted By phil donohue, costa rica, california : November 4, 2007 12:10 pm

Typical Steve Jobs control freak efforts. You wonder why Apple computers lag the market? Because Jobs is a selfish child who never grew up. (I want it my way, or no way!) This will happen to these newer technology items too. Mac was first, but PC ran far ahead because of proprietary systems. Nothing’s changed.

Posted By JamesK, Portage, MI : November 4, 2007 11:40 am

This comment doesn’t make sense.

The TIFF exploit is a bug that affects security. Apple has to fix this!

If third party hacks use such an exploit, than this is their fault. Nobody in their right mind should want apple not to fix a bug and possible security exploit just to let those party hacks keep working.

Let apple fix the bug, and let the hackers find a new way to break in, without making absurd statements about this!

Posted By bill, easton, pa : November 4, 2007 11:40 am

I work in the software industry and though it may seem that Apple is trying to limit users I might suggest they are simply trying to insure all apps work together without issues. Often times OS software and drivers get out of synch and then the problems start. Having and using a deveopers kit limits future problems.

Posted By Ken R, Wasshington, DC : November 4, 2007 11:13 am

When I purchase a phone it becomes my property to do with as I please. Apple has no right to prevent me modifying my property. I would never buy an iPhone from such a disreputable company.

Posted By Tony, St. Paul, MN : November 4, 2007 10:20 am
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Philip Elmer-DeWittSilicon Valley veterans like to joke that Steve Jobs must be surrounded by a reality distortion field; if you get too close to him, you start to believe what he's saying. Thanks to the success of the iPod, the launch of the iPhone and the renewed interest in the Mac, Apple has made believers out of millions of customers - and made a lot of investors rich. But Philip Elmer-DeWitt believes that an ounce of skepticism never hurts when writing about the company. He should know. He's been covering Apple - and watching Steve Jobs operate - since 1982, first for Time Magazine, then for Business 2.0, and now for Fortune.
Subscribe to Apple 2.0: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.