Mac news from outside the reality distortion field
Type Size  -  +
November 12, 2007, 8:05 am

Report: Ultralight MacBook at Macworld

picture-33.jpgRumors that Apple (AAPL) was set to release an ultralight notebook computer real soon now have been circulating as far back as Dec. 2006.

By July 2007, MacScoop was quoting “trusted sources” that before the end of the year the company would release “a notebook that is so small and light that it could redefine the standards of ultra-portable computing.”

Now it’s pretty clear that 2007 will come and go without delivering on the rumors.

But in his latest report to clients, Piper Jaffrey’s Gene Munster says he’s 75% certain that an ultralight MacBook “or possibly an entirely new product” will be coming in January at Macworld Expo.

What makes him so sure? The new 64 gigabyte solid-state drive with NAND flash memory that Samsung released last week. “We believe,” he writes, “NAND Flash drive sizes have now reached capacities that Apple would consider large enough to include in a new MacBook model.”

Ryan Block at Engadget couldn’t wait. He dropped one of the new Samsung drives in a MacBook Pro. His report:

This is really how everyone’s laptop experience should be: free from worries about platter scratches or head crashes from bumps or drops; silent, cool drive operation; super fast access to your data. It’s just an early taste of what portable computing will be like in a few years, and it’s amazing. (link)

UPDATE: AppleInsider, which has been tracking development of the ultralight Mac since February, treats the Macworld unveiling as a done deal — and goes on to add some detail to the machine’s putative specs. “The 13-inch portable,” writes Kaper Jade, “will mark the Cupertino-based Mac maker’s re-entry into the sub-notebook market — arriving in a form-factor that’s approximately 50 percent lighter and strikingly slimmer than the company’s current 15-inch professional MacBook Pro offering.” (link)

I’ve read about a ’strange touch pad’. i’ve read a cell phone some how into the ultra. what if the touch pad was a iphone looking touch pad. so when you use the open fingers on the pad it would open up pictures just like it does on iphone. that way i would be using les keystroke and les ‘mouse’ funtions. plus get a cell phone system in it.

Posted By Chris Timco, Dearborn, Michigan : December 24, 2007 8:58 am

Leopard is ready to go for this. A Mac laptop will actually have some room left over for user storage.

Consider the following install sizes

1. Leopard — 9GB full install
2. Vista — 45 GB (15GB required free space on drive by MS) full install

Posted By Michael Austin,TX : December 18, 2007 11:29 am

It’s a shame that Apple is going for a fairly conservative solution for their ultralight Macbook. There is clearly a market out there for a product that uses IPhone / ITouch type hardware together with some spreadsheet / word processing capability – yet provide instantaneous access, ease of data entry and userfriendliness – yet come with a 12″ or 13″ touchscreen.
It’s a shame that we always get ‘the classic solution’, the moment people think about notebooks or laptops.

Posted By Martin Storb, Geneva : November 13, 2007 3:49 am

“Report”? I think you misspelled “rumor” there.

The only actual report is from an analyst who thinks there might be an ultralight or something completely different next year. I suppose the misrepresentation in the headling had its desired effect, as it convinced me to click on the link, but it has further poisoned my opinion of this blog’s author.

Posted By aa, Kokomo IN : November 12, 2007 2:22 pm

The problem with ThriftyTechie’s theory is that s/he is thrifty; Apple has spent decades crafting its users not to think crap-low-end-best-buy as the primary purchasing criterium. That’s Dell’s M.O. and it’s why Dell is now #2. Apple users/acolytes/wingnuts are willing to pay for the proper hardware for the proper use; one reason my LC-III had a SCSI disk rather than PATA. They were more robust; end of story. Leave the disk failures to the AST Bravos & Co.

As an aside, I don’t use OS X, but an Open Source OS that’s not Linux. OS X is beautiful but I find it too intrusive in operation. Still going the SCSI route though…

Posted By The Fronny, Denver, CO : November 12, 2007 12:10 pm

Could this be the resurrection of the PowerBook name?

Posted By Snyd, Fairbanks, Alaska : November 12, 2007 11:28 am

Must be cheap and good

Posted By Anonymous : November 12, 2007 10:55 am

There’s no question that 64 GB would be plenty of storage for an ultraportable device. Even 30 GB would be adequate for a syncable ultraportable used as a secondary computing device…

The problem, as always, is cost.

Posted By ThriftyTechie, Jersey City, NJ : November 12, 2007 10:32 am
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Philip Elmer-DeWittSilicon Valley veterans like to joke that Steve Jobs must be surrounded by a reality distortion field; if you get too close to him, you start to believe what he's saying. Thanks to the success of the iPod, the launch of the iPhone and the renewed interest in the Mac, Apple has made believers out of millions of customers - and made a lot of investors rich. But Philip Elmer-DeWitt believes that an ounce of skepticism never hurts when writing about the company. He should know. He's been covering Apple - and watching Steve Jobs operate - since 1982, first for Time Magazine, then for Business 2.0, and now for Fortune.
Subscribe to Apple 2.0: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.