Report: Apple cancels summer vacations
When did the tech press become obsessed with the vacation schedules of retail employees?
I can answer that.
It started last spring, with the leak of an AT&T Mobility internal memo asking store staffers not to schedule vacations between mid-June and mid-July — four weeks that neatly bracketed what turned out to be the June 29, 2007 launch of the original iPhone.
The same thing happened again last month; this year, AT&T (T) employees have been asked to stick around for the four weeks starting June 15 and ending July 12 — roughly corresponding to the expected launch date of iPhone 2.0. See here.
So what are we to make of the report from AppleInsider that Apple (AAPL) retail staffers in some regions have been informed that back-to-back vacation days during that period are forbidden, as are multiple weekend absences, from the third week of July to the second week of August?
According to AppleInsider, the vacation blackout has to do with a bigger-than-ever back-to-school promotion, the details of which are expected to be revealed to Apple’s higher-ed partners Monday at 2:30 p.m. ET (11:30 a.m. PT).
And what about vacations in June, when the 3G iPhone is supposed to arrive? Perhaps Apple Store employees don’t need to be told that if they aren’t on hand for the first big weekend, they needn’t bother coming in Monday.
[Update: Reader T-Shirt from Richardson, Texas, in the suburbs of Dallas (where there are three Apple Stores) has it on "very good" authority that Apple retail employees have the same vacation black-out dates as do the AT&T wireless employees.]
[Update 2: I kicked this around a bit more and as near as I can tell, there doesn't seem to be anything to either of these rumors. Go ahead and take that vacation, Mr. T-Shirt.]
It’s one thing to allow comments to a story like this. It’s quite another to update your article with comments from a non-corroborated source. I’ve found that Fortune articles are part of the problem in trying to discern Apple’s moves. When you post people’s wishes or thoughts as news, then every other site posts it as news, and then Fortune refers to them as a source, and then it’s reported by CNBC & every other news outfit. This process creates a feedback loop, hiding real news in a sea of useless noise. Did you actually check with a source at any Apple Store to see if they have vacation time limitations at the same time as AT&T employees? This is known as “fact checking.”
ex ped: No, that’s called reporting.
Another update from Mr. Steve: All Apple employees, male or female, are forbidden to have babies from June 9 to August 1 due to the grand celebration of our precious iPhone’s first Birthday. All pregnant employees, male or female, should either induce prior to this date or plug until August. Each complying employee will be rewarded with an iPhone teething ring made of genuine Apple plastics. Noncompliance will result in immediate termination without severance.
Have a nice day,
Stevie
BTW, I have it on “very good” authority that Apple Retail store employees have the same black-out dates as do the at&t wireless employees.
- Tech sector snaphot: Apple’s shifting fortunes
- Wal-Mart’s post-Christmas iPhone sale
- A conversation with my iPhone
- 15 reasons Macs trump Windows PCs
- BlackBerry Storm vs. Apple iPhone: 8 reasons pro and con
- iPhone: Has Google lost its voice? (UPDATE)
- IBM must put up $3 million in Papermaster case
- iPhone disconnects in India
- Video: Windows on an iPhone
- Analyst: Apple’s Q1 will beat Street by $1.2 billion
- All a blackberry storm is, is a touch... More
- Hmmm...let's see...who can afford an... More
- Walmart has great employment opportun... More
- iPhone user for over a year, and lovi... More
- he is right i went to a verizon store... More
- Interesting. Reminds me a little of t... More
- “i’ve had an iphone 3g since laun... More
- Think about it for a minute...Apple i... More
- you state that one of the iphones... More
- Dave in Rochester.... Does that me... More





No, it’s definitely called fact checking. I’m not surprised that you seem to be unfamiliar with the concept.