Mac news from outside the reality distortion field
Type Size  -  +
November 18, 2008, 8:45 am

A conversation with my iPhone

mobile-appGoogle voice search, the most eagerly anticipated improvement to the iPhone since 3G, finally showed up late Monday.

For readers who haven’t been following this drama, Google (GOOG) on Friday launched a media blitz for this hot new feature, which lets you search the Web by simply speaking into your phone. But for reasons known only to God and Steve Jobs, Apple (AAPL) made the world cool its heels a few days before releasing the program. (See Has Google lost its voice?)

Needless to say, we couldn’t wait to give the app a try. So first thing Tuesday morning, we downloaded the free update, fired up Google Mobile App, and started talking to our iPhone. Here’s what ensued:

  • Q: What took so long?
  • A: Woodfield Mall
  • Q: Why the delay?
  • A: “I did it my way” (Frank Sinatra)
  • Q: Did Steve Jobs hold you up?
  • A: What’s Steve Jobs got up his sleeve?
  • Q: Are Apple-Google relations strained?
  • A: Look for good fortune on 8/8/08
  • Q: What’s next for Google Mobile App?
  • A: Utility vehicles, Mobile Alabama

We can’t wait!

Below: Watch Google engineer Mike LeBeau find a giant squid on his iPhone.


I was searching for the phone number for the restaurant “Bamboo Grove” and it came back with “man boob grope”.

Posted By Steve - Portland, OR : November 26, 2008 5:24 am

What I want to know is why Mike LeBeau was looking for unicorn pictures.

Posted By Brian, Brooklyn, New York : November 19, 2008 6:39 pm

Stop the presses! WinMo had voice recognition first. This is earth-shattering news and guess what? It hasn’t helped the WinMo platform one iota and fewer and fewer people will give a fig about the WinMo platform once the iPhone picks up global steam. WinMo is old news, soon to join Palm in the race for mobile OS bottom-feeders.

Posted By iphonerulez, Brooklyn, New York : November 18, 2008 10:00 pm

The guy who wrote this article, should focus on things in 50’s or 60’s and do history stuff and should not be allowed to write tech stuff, he had no clue what this technology is.

Posted By Rajeev, Westborough, MA : November 18, 2008 2:54 pm

This is NOT pioneering stuff, Microsoft’s Live search for mobile phones already has voice recognition and it works pretty well. I do prefer Google Maps over MS’s maps on my WinMo phone though so this is a welcome addition.

Posted By Patrick, Santa Clara, CA : November 18, 2008 1:38 pm

I don’t think this article does the technology - or the reader - any justice at all. This is pioneering stuff, that will likely shift the goalposts in the same way as the iPhone itself has done.

I’m not sure this kind of cynical stance, with no real information benefit, belongs on what should be a reasonably mature blog. There are plenty of other sites for this kind of chortle…

Posted By TB, Phoenix, AZ : November 18, 2008 11:41 am

Thanks Google !!! If google can do this in an app, why can’t apple can do with their own device… Apple dones nothing after get us a great phone…

Posted By Deepak, NJ : November 18, 2008 11:35 am

love google and hate ATT, what’s a guy to do?

Posted By J, KC : November 18, 2008 10:58 am

I highly doubt that voice search is “the most eagerly anticipated improvement to the iPhone since 3G.” Competing for that title would instead be Copy/Paste, or a little closer to home, Voice Dialing.

Posted By NM, fort Wayne, IN : November 18, 2008 10:40 am

Very cool
Works good so far. Nice to see Google is doing something productive. Now if I could only get them to fix my homepage(still upset about left side bar on homepage)

Posted By James, Austin Tx : November 18, 2008 10:16 am

So your tongue in cheek (’you are chic”) examples, and your headline, imply the i-phone voice recognition program doesn’t work too well. But is that Apples fault or Google’s app?

Posted By MT New Jersey : November 18, 2008 10:03 am
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Philip Elmer-DeWittSilicon Valley veterans like to joke that Steve Jobs must be surrounded by a reality distortion field; if you get too close to him, you start to believe what he's saying. Thanks to the success of the iPod, the launch of the iPhone and the renewed interest in the Mac, Apple has made believers out of millions of customers - and made a lot of investors rich. But Philip Elmer-DeWitt believes that an ounce of skepticism never hurts when writing about the company. He should know. He's been covering Apple - and watching Steve Jobs operate - since 1982, first for Time Magazine, then for Business 2.0, and now for Fortune.
Subscribe to Apple 2.0: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.